Publications by Year: 2023

2023
Sarazm: A Site along the Proto-Silk Road at the Intersection of the Steppe and Oasis Cultures.
Mutin, Benjamin, Sarazm: A Site along the Proto-Silk Road at the Intersection of the Steppe and Oasis Cultures. Oxus I (Brepols, 2023), pp. xxvi + 258 p., 20 b/w, 181 col., 74 tables b/w., 8 maps color.Abstract
Results from Excavation VII

Sarazm, in modern-day Tajikistan, is rightly famous as an archaeological site. A Chalcolithic and Bronze Age settlement, it formed part of a cultural and economic network that stretched from the steppe of Central Asia across to the Iranian Plateau and the Indus. Between 1984 and 1994, fi eld-work led by a joint Tajik-French project took place at Excavation VII, yielding unique archaeological contexts and materials that shed light on Sarazm’s multicultural nature, its evolution through time, and the varied activities that took place at the site. Now, in this new volume, the fi rst comprehensive description and analysis of all available data from Excavation VII is presented, and the data from this excavation contextualized both at site level and within the broader setting of the Steppe and Oasis cultures of the IVth and IIIrd millennia BCE. The author offers functional, cultural, and chronological conclusions about the exposed occupations, as well as putting forward new interpretations and hypotheses on this important settlement. 

The publication project was directed by Benjamin Mutin.
For purchsing information, please visit the publisher's website.

Shiqmim II. The phase II excavations at a Chalcolithic settlement center in the northern Negev desert, Israel (1987–1993)
Levy, Thomas E., Yorke Rowan, and Margie M. Burton, ed. Shiqmim II. The phase II excavations at a Chalcolithic settlement center in the northern Negev desert, Israel (1987–1993) (BAR Publishing, 2023), pp. 220.Abstract

The Chalcolithic period (ca. 4500–3600 BCE) in the southern Levant represents the rise of regional polities, the metallurgical revolution, and a set of other significant socio-economic changes that distinguish it from the preceding Pottery Neolithic period. Central to these issues are the Phase II (1987–1989, 1993) excavations at Shiqmim, a large Chalcolithic settlement centre in Israel’s northern Negev desert. The first phase of excavations at Shiqmim took place between 1979 and 1984 and were described in Shiqmim I, Parts i and ii (BAR Publishing, 1987). Shiqmim II reports on the second phase of excavations at this complex site and contributes to a greater understanding of its Chalcolithic stratigraphy, architecture, and chronology. It includes the project research design and history framed in an anthropological archaeology perspective, primary excavation data, and a Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates from Shiqmim presented in comparison with dates from contemporary regional sites.

The publication project was directed by Thomas E. Levy with a grant awarded in 1999, and the volume was co-edited with Yorke M. Rowan and Margie M. Burton.
For more information, or to purchase, please visit the publisher's website.

Sangtarashan: the Iron Age at Pish Kuh of Luristan
Hashemi, Zahra, Mehrdad Malekzadeh, and Ata Hasanpour, Sangtarashan: the Iron Age at Pish Kuh of Luristan (Peeters, 2023), pp. 331.Abstract

With a study "The lithic assemblage of Sangtarashan" by Francesca Manclossi

Sangtarashan is an archaeological site located in the central part of the Zagros Mountain in the Luristan region (Western Iran). Discovered in 2002, the site was the subject of six excavation seasons between 2005 and 2011.

From the first archaeological investigations, it became clear that the site presents an exceptional character. Within a circular stone structure, overlapped by several other constructions, over two thousand artefacts, among them hundreds of metallic objects known as “the Bronzes of Luristan,” have been uncovered. These artefacts were buried as a package under the floor, embedded in the walls or scattered over the surface of the site.

Architectural and artefact studies led to a proposal of Sangtarashan as a ritual place with two occupation levels. Artefact deposits from the first level consisted of weapons and vessels and were buried as packages under the floor of the sanctuary. Those of the second level, made up of isolated objects, smaller in size and more varied in nature, were deposited in the walls or scattered on the surface. The first occupation level dates to the Iron Age I-II and the second dates to the Iron Age II-III (and perhaps even IV). The hypothesis of a non-ritual function for the second level is not entirely ruled out, given the extension of the architectural structures to the west and the position of objects scattered across the entire site.

Along with Surkh Dom-i Lori, Sangtarashan is the second Iron Age sanctuary in the Central Zagros where worshippers dedicated hundreds of artefacts as ritual deposits. The richness of metal artifacts discovered in Sangtarashan placed it as a reference site for the study of the Bronzes of Luristan.

The publication project was directed by the 2018 grant award recipient Zahra Hashemi.
For more information, or to purchase the volume, please visit the publisher's website.

Priniàs I. The protoarchaic complex on the southern slope of the Patela
Pautasso, Antonella, and Salvatore Rizza, Priniàs I. The protoarchaic complex on the southern slope of the Patela (Fiorentina, All'Insegna del Giglio; #34, Monografie della Scuola Archeologica di Atene e delle Missioni Italiane in Oriente, 2023), pp. 350.Abstract

The volume focuses on a large Protoarchaic block on the southern slope of the Patela of Prinias. Built in several phases during the 7th century BC, the block played an important role within the settlement, in terms of structure and spatial organisation, but mainly because it contained a large building (Building C) with a central eschara and its annexes.

The Protoarchaic building complex is located at the SE vertex of the ideal triangle formed by the Patela plateau. Excavations carried out between 1989 and 1994 by Giovanni Rizza revealed three independent building complexes or blocks and three streets, articulated on an area with a slope of about 17% and arranged on sloping terraces. The protoarchaic complex corresponds to the central block, which is certainly the best preserved due to its position on the slope. The excavation method followed during the exploration of the Protoarchaic complex from 1989 to 1994 involved the successive removal of different layers of earth, the composition and thickness of which are always recorded on the notebooks. The data recording in the various excavation notebooks is always precise and often accompanied by sketches; the description of the operations carried out during the excavation, completed by references to the finds, as well as to the graphic and photographic documentation, was regularly recorded. The re-reading of the excavation reports, together with the study of the materials (804 objects, largely unpublished before this study, and including pottery, coroplastic finds, textile tools, metal objects, small finds of stone, bone, clay and glass, and a very important inscription painted on a vase), has made it possible to note previously overlooked data, which have often proved fundamental to the reconstruction of the complex as well as to its interpretation.

The complex covers an area where older evidence is present. Apart from a few sporadic objects that date to an earlier period than LM IIIC, when the permanent occupation of the Patela dates back, there are a number of rock cut structures in the area. Over time, these structures were first respected by the builders of the complex and later incorporated into Building C. Among them are a tripartite base/bench carved into the rock, a column base and a long bench, as well as several rock carvings. The area also yielded a number of Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age objects. Throughout the Protogeometric period (11th-9th centuries) and to a lesser extent during the 8th century, the area was intensively used, probably in connection with the performance of cultic/ceremonial practices, as attested by the presence of coroplastic finds and a considerable amount of pottery, as well as a large burnt area, probably a hearth.

The earlier core of the protoarchaic complex was built in the first half of the 7th century BC, as evidenced by a foundation deposit consisting of four skyphoi. The first structure of the complex was a long oikos, divided internally into three rooms of different sizes, the central room being slightly larger. In a short space of time, by the middle of the 7th century, the complex had expanded to include a series of rooms arranged around a central courtyard. It is worth noting that this earlier structure did not cover the rock carvings, but preserved them on the outside of the southern wall by deliberately retracting its course.

With the construction of Building C and its annexes in the late 7th century, the complex underwent some changes. Building C was not an isolated building, but was structurally and ideologically linked to the pre-existing block, although it did not communicate directly with it. Access to the building was not free or open to a space or a street. On the contrary, it was filtered through a closed passage consisting of a door and a staircase leading to an open space in front of the building, a courtyard created by the division of the north-south street.

Inside Building C, the oldest structures, namely the tripartite bench carved into the rock, were now included in the area of the vestibule. The remaining rock carvings in the area of the main hall were obliterated by the paved floor of the new building, with the possible exception of the bench on the N side, which probably remained in use.

All the material evidence, especially the pottery, suggests that Building C had a function related to communal dining. This function is clearly integrated by the archaeological documentation found in the courtyard and in the annexes. The courtyard was an open space where food was stored, processed and prepared, while an adjoining room, containing some thirteen large pithoi, was a storeroom.

The areas dedicated to the processing and preparation of food, the iteration of table services, the emphasis on the storage of resources on a supra-household level, the organisation of communal meals, the cultic aspect (the tripartite base-bench?), the presence of weapons (a possible fragment of a bronze mitra and a sauroter) and of an inscribed aryballos (whose inscription celebrates Θλ[- -], the fastest of the dromeis) are all elements related to the conceptual sphere referable to the term andreion. To these data should be added further remarks on the finds (faunal remains of wild animals, dog bones and iron arrowheads) that attest to the practice of hunting, which, along with warfare and athleticism, played a fundamental role in the ideology of masculine identity and constituted one of the fundamental aspects of Cretan agoghè.

The proposed interpretation considers building C as an andreion, complemented by the annexes and the remaining rooms of the protoarchaic complex. This interpretation involved a brief reconsideration of the question of the function of the so-called hearth temples and, above all, a review of some of the most significant examples of buildings with a communal dining function on Crete (notably Aphratì, Azoria and Praisòs). A number of points of contact were found with these buildings, despite obvious planimetric differences.

Finally, the complex was considered in the context of the urban development of Prinias during the 7th century and in relation to other buildings.

The identification of a discontinuity in the function of important public/communal and residential buildings in the late 7th century, coinciding with the construction of the well-known Temple A and the complex of Building C with its annexes, highlights the crucial importance of this period for the development of the Prinias settlement, which corresponds to the definitive rise of the polis. The changes, probably linked to the growth of the settlement and a new organisation of the spaces, must be read in terms of social competition, a phenomenon also evident in the contemporary funerary dimension.

The grant award from the White Levy Program to produce this work was issued to
Dr. Antonella Pautasso in 2020.
For more information or to purchase the volume, please visit the publisher's website.

The Second Cataract Fortress of Dorginarti. NE 12.
Heidorn, Lisa, The Second Cataract Fortress of Dorginarti. NE 12. (Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures, U. of Chicago, 2023), pp. • Pp. lii + 496; 184 figures, 7 tables, 3 maps, 10 plans, 107 plates.Abstract

With contributions by Carol Myer and Joanna Then-Obluska

The best-known sites along the length of the Nile River's Second Cataract are the ruins of Egyptian towns and fortresses occupied during the Old, Middle, and New Kingdoms. One of the fortresses in the Second Cataract region, Dorginarti existed in a later era than the better-known Middle and New Kingdom forts. The earliest ceramics found at the site date from the later tenth or early ninth century BC, and those from a later occupation stem from the early eighth century. The latest phase of occupation did not extend far beyond the first phase of Persian dominance in Egypt beginning in the last quarter of the sixth century BC.
This volume is the final report of the emergency excavations undertaken at Dorginarti for five months in 1964 by the University of Chicago's Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures as part of the UNESCO Nubian salvage project necessitated by the building of the Aswan High Dam. Following a description of the fortress's landscape and resources, the book describes Dorginarti's architecture in detail and then presents the selection of artifacts brought back from the Sudan and stored in the ISAC Museum. The picture that emerges from the archaeological record shows the continuing importance of Lower Nubia after the withdrawal of Egyptian control in the late second millennium BC and before the rise of the Kushite empire in the Twenty-Fifth Dynasty.

The book is authored by Lisa Heidorn
Please visit the publisher's website to download, purchase or for additional information.
Discovering the kingdom of Ugarit (Syria of the 2nd millennium). C.F.A. Schaeffer's excavations at Minet el-Beida and Ras Shamra (1929‒1937).
Sauvage, Caroline, and Christine Lorre, ed. Discovering the kingdom of Ugarit (Syria of the 2nd millennium). C.F.A. Schaeffer's excavations at Minet el-Beida and Ras Shamra (1929‒1937). (Austrian Academy of Sciences Press (Contributions to the Archaeology of Egypt, Nubia and the Levant 7), 2023).Abstract

À la découverte du royaume d'Ougarit (Syrie du IIe millénaire). Les fouilles de C.F.A. Schaeffer à Minet el-Beida et Ras Shamra (1929‒1937).

With contributions from Olivier Callot, Annie Caubet, Claude Chanut, Philippe Claeys, Sophie Cluzan, Éric Coqueugniot, Patrice Courtaud, Guillaume Gernez, Robert Hawley, Sarah Ivorra, Christine Lorre, Valérie Matoïan, Nadine Mattielli, Claire Newton, François Poplin, Virginie Renson, Caroline Sauvage, Jean-Frédéric Terral, Marguerite Yon
 

This monograph presents the archaeological material that was found during the first years of the excavations in Ras Shamra-Ugarit led by C. F. A. Schaeffer. The catalogue is the result of a multidisciplinary collective research project in which numerous specialists from a wide range of disciplines participated, many of them being members of the Syrian-French archaeological mission in Ras Shamra-Ugarit. Over the years, up until the armed conflict broke out in 2011, a huge number of finds were uncovered, those presented here representing only a small part thereof. The aim of the publication is to make available a selection of types which Schaeffer considered representative of the culture, his own research having made a significant contribution to deciphering it. With regard to the collections held by the National Archaeological Museum of France in St.-Germain-en-Laye, the finds from the harbour town of Minet el-Beida, which became a military zone after 1961 and was therefore no longer accessible, are worthy of particular attention. Adding to the series of publications on Ras Shamra-Ugarit that have come out since 1978, the aim of this volume is to contribute to knowledge of the archaeological site, which is one of the most important Bronze Age sites in the eastern Mediterranean region.

The publication project was directed by Dr. Caroline Sauvage.

Shengavit: A Kura-Araxes Center in Armenia
Rothman, Mitchell, and Hakob Simonyan, ed. Shengavit: A Kura-Araxes Center in Armenia (Costa Mesa, CA. Mazda, 2023), pp. 298 + xii . Publisher's VersionAbstract

The Kura-Araxes cultural tradition and its related societal structures originated at about 3500 BC and lasted until 2500 BC. Although archaeologists recognized its typical artifacts, which included a package of pottery style, housing, and ritual, more than 100 years ago, little was known outside its homeland region. This was in large part because that homeland lay behind the Iron Curtain, and such material that was published was in local languages that few outside it did not usually read, and local journals that were often unavailable internationally.  Interest in the West arose initially through areas outside of the South Caucasus. This is because, starting at about 3200 BC, small groups of migrants carrying the Kura-Araxes cultural package began to settle toward the west in the Taurus Mountains and by 2850 BC into the Levant. Somewhat later migrants began to spread eastward into the highlands of the Zagros Mountains. Research on these migrant communities therefore began before the fall of the Iron Curtain in Turkey, Iran, and the Levant (the Amuq of Turkey, north Syria, Israel, and Jordan). After the independence of South Caucasian states, cooperation of South-Caucasian, West Europeans, and Americans increased dramatically. This book represents one such collaboration of Armenian and American colleagues. 

The broader importance of the Kura-Araxes lies in part in its difference from neighboring cultures. The Kura-Araxes is parallel in time to the origin of cities and states in the alluvial plains of Mesopotamia to its south (the LC3-5/Uruk and Early Dynastic I/II). Unlike its neighbor to the south, the Kura-Araxes's homeland lies in the mountainous environments of the South Caucasus (Armenia, Georgia, and Azerbaijan). Although there were significant intercultural connections with Northern Mesopotamia in the LC2, represented in part by Chaff-Faced Wares, a cultural barrier appeared to cut the mountains off from the Mesopotamian Jazira for the next millennium. The first five hundred years of the Kura-Araxes (KA1) were typified by small, egalitarian societies of farmer-herders with homogeneous cultural traditions, represented in its pottery styles and other cultural aspects. The second 500 years (KA2) saw some Balkanization in cultural traditions and some kinds of increases in societal complexity, though not at all as complex as the state-level societies to its south. Therefore the nature and evolutionary trajectory of the Kura-Araxes cultural tradition and societal structures present interesting cases for study and for comparison.

Some of the changes of the KA2 include an increase in population, sophistication of craft technology, and integration of smaller polities with centers of increased size, although still small by Mesopotamian contemporaneous standards. The site of Shengavit, located in the city of Yerevan on a high bluff over the Hrazdan River (now dammed to create Lake Yerevan), represents one of these small centers at 6 hectares. The site was excavated from the 1930's to the 1980's and 2000-2008. Many artifacts are housed in the National History Museum, the Erebuni Museum, and the Yerevan Museum. Yet little real detail was published on the site and its artifacts. Less yet was probed about the political and economic organization, interactions, and ideological features these artifacts represented. So, in 2009 Rothman joined Simonyan with the idea to make these artifacts and their interpretations available to a wider audience. They began with three excavation seasons using modern techniques to clarify some issues. They brought together a set of talented experts from Armenia and America. This volume represents descriptions and analyses of the architecture, natural environment, archaeobotany, archaeozoology, metallurgy, lithics, pottery, ground stone and bone tools, rituals, mortuary practices, symbols, and personal adornments of an ancient people in a mountainous corner of the Middle East. What sort of picture can we paint from the still preliminary patterns and colors these artifacts provide? 
The publication project was directed by Dr. Mitchell Rothman.